• Home
  • Videos
  • Signup for Emails
  • What You Can Do
  • About True Dignity
    • About the Board
    • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Report Abuse

True Dignity Vermont

Vermont Citizens Against Assisted Suicide

Suicide is never death with dignity, and assisted suicide legislation threatens true patient choices at the end of life.

Feeds:
Posts
« Sixty Legislators Make Valiant Effort to Repeal Act 39
Talking About Death and Dying: A Case for Denial »

The slippery slope is now an ice slope

 

May 1, 2015 by Administrators

Senate Bill 108 was approved Thursday by a narrow majority of representatives in the Vermont House, who offered little justification for their refusal to consider several proposed amendments that called for adding safeguards that might have helped prevent abuse and coercion of vulnerable Vermonters under Act 39.

A strong minority bipartisan coalition of the same legislators who lost a bid to fully repeal Act 39 the day before, continued their fight by proposing amendments to add protections to the bill and to ask for more data to help evaluate how the law is working. Among those sponsoring amendments Thursday were Representatives Janssen Willhoit (R-St. Johnsbury), Mark Higley (R-Lowell), Anne Donahue (R-Northfield), Lynn Dickinson (R-St. Albans Town), and Corey Parent (R-St. Albans City).

Many more spoke articulately and passionately in support of these amendments, and for the right to consider them.

Proponents of Act 39 offered little defense of their position and simply relied on their majority status to preserve S.108 in its nearly-original form, turning a deaf ear to compelling arguments for restoring the very same protections they approved in the original bill that led to Act 39 in 2013. That bill was stripped down in a last-minute deal among lawmakers hell bent on legalizing physician assisted suicide.

Two amendments were ruled not-germane by Speaker of the House Shap Smith; motions made to allow the body to vote on them as not-germane were predictably defeated. After one such defeat, Rep. Donahue said, “Refusing to consider this amendment is a blow to reconsideration of deep flaws in what this law purports to protect.”

Her explanation was followed by one from Rep. Doug Gage (R-Rutland) who said, “Mr. Speaker, there are allegations of known abuse of elders within this legislation. Don’t we owe it to our elderly to legislate a fix to this kind of abuse?”

Freshman Representative Corey Parent offered an amendment that would have called for more comprehensive data collection and a consideration of repeal of Act 39, pending legislative review, in 2018. He made a strong case for why such data is essential to responsibly studying Act 39.

Rep. Donahue spoke in support of the amendment, saying that if Vermont is, in fact, a “laboratory” for aid-in-dying laws, as asserted by the Vermont Ethics Network in some of their printed literature, then the Legislature needs to approach Act 39 “like good scientists,” collecting data to test the hypothesis that “Act 39 is working” or not.

A prepared list of challenge questions was read by Rep. John Bartholomew (D-Windsor), who seemed to be the assigned hatchet man for Act 39 proponents throughout Thursday’s debate. Most of his questions suggested that costs associated with data collection and creating rules would be burdensome to the State, making one wonder whether he felt that protecting human lives was too cost-ineffective to be viable.

When the data-collection amendment failed, a frustrated Rep. Paul Poirier (I-Barre) explained his vote by saying, “I voted yes for more data, but unfortunately the proponents are afraid of real data. What are they afraid of? The slippery slope is now an ice slope. Who needs good data- as it only gets in the way.”

Despite the absence any substantive defense of their refusal to consider adding safeguards to Act 39, the majority status of supporters ensured the passage of S.108, which did nothing more than repeal the sunset provision Act 39, keeping in place the very few safeguards that survived the hatchet-job it underwent on its way to passage in 2013. These safeguards would otherwise have gone away in July 2016.

We thank all those legislators who acted so decisively in defense of all Vermonters, rather than capitulating to the privileged few who want to compel physicians to assist them in obtaining the means to kill themselves.

Details of the amendments offered and of the roll-call votes can be found in the House Journal for April 30: http://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Documents/2016/Docs/JOURNAL/hj150430.pdf

Please take a moment to find out how your representatives voted, and be sure to thank those who supported efforts for full-scale repeal and amendments to protect the rights and safety of all Vermonters.

We will continue to fight.

 

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend
  • Share on Facebook
  • Click to share on Google+
  • Click to share on Twitter
  • More
  • Click to print
  • Click to share on Tumblr
  • Click to share on Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket
  • Click to share on StumbleUpon

Related

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment



  • facebook  YouTube-social-squircle_red  Twitter
  • Menu

    • Home
    • Videos
    • Signup for Emails
    • What You Can Do
    • About True Dignity
      • About the Board
      • Contact Us
    • Links
    • Report Abuse
  • Stay Active!

    • Get Action Alerts Emails
    • Make Calls
    • Write Letters
  • Stay Informed!

    • Join our email list
  • Vermont Government

    • Governor Peter Shumlin
    • Lt. Governor Phil Scott
    • State Reps By District
    • State Senators By District
    • VT Legislative Directory
  • Article Categories

    • Ablism (2)
    • Acceptance of Unintended Consequences (5)
    • Action Alert (3)
    • Administrative (4)
    • Agism (4)
    • Alerts (24)
    • Animal euthanasia argument (4)
    • Board (1)
    • Brittany Maynard (1)
    • California (1)
    • Canada (3)
    • Canada Supreme Court (1)
    • Cheapness of Assisted Suicide (4)
    • Choice Becomes "Duty" to Die (11)
    • Chronic Diseases Rendered Terminal by Non-treatment (3)
    • Classism and Assisted Suicide (5)
    • Colorado (2)
    • Commentary (27)
    • Compassion and Choices (7)
    • Conflict of Interest (3)
    • Connecticut (2)
    • Connecticut (2)
    • Connecticut (2)
    • Conscience Rights (1)
    • Cost Cutting Agenda of Barbara Coombs Lee (2)
    • Countering the PAS lobby (1)
    • CT (1)
    • Damage to Family (3)
    • Damage to Helpers (1)
    • Death with Dignity (3)
    • Defeats in other states (8)
    • Depression (7)
    • Devaluation of Lives with Disabilities (33)
    • Disability Rights Groups' Opposition (30)
    • Doctor's Power (2)
    • Dying with Real Dignity (1)
    • Editorials (5)
    • Elder Abuse (22)
    • Election 2014 (3)
    • Error Possibility (2)
    • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Contagion (3)
    • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Two Sides of the Same Coin (8)
    • Exemption options (4)
    • Expansion of Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia (14)
    • Georgia (3)
    • Germany (1)
    • Healthy people helped to commit suicide (2)
    • Language manipulation (3)
    • Legal Opinions (7)
    • Legislative Efforts in Other Countries (3)
    • Legislative Efforts in Other States (9)
    • Legislative Testimony (1)
    • Letters to the Editors of Newspapers (13)
    • Letters to the Legislature (2)
    • Maryland (1)
    • Massachusetts (3)
    • Medical Opinions (18)
    • Medical Power (5)
    • Medical Societies (4)
    • Montana (2)
    • Moratorium (2)
    • Murder Invitation (2)
    • Nevada (1)
    • Nevada (1)
    • Never Investigated (1)
    • New Jersey (5)
    • New York (1)
    • Not a Peaceful Death (4)
    • Oregon (4)
    • Other Countries (2)
    • Other Countries (1)
    • Other States (7)
    • Other states (4)
    • Out of State/General (10)
    • Palliative Care (6)
    • Personal Stories (5)
    • Pharmacists (6)
    • Polls (4)
    • Pro Assisted Suicide (1)
    • Prognosis Inaccuracy (2)
    • Racism and Assisted Suicide (1)
    • Randy Brock (1)
    • Rationing (3)
    • Reasons to Oppose (3)
    • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in Other Countries (3)
    • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in other states (5)
    • Relatives Won't Know (3)
    • Religious "movement" (1)
    • Repeal Effort (4)
    • Richard Doerflinger (1)
    • Selfishness of Proponents (3)
    • Selling of Suicide (5)
    • Silencing Opposition (2)
    • Slippery Slope (23)
    • Suicide Contagion (21)
    • Suicide Increase (9)
    • Suicide Tourism (3)
    • Talking Points (2)
    • Testimony before non-VT legislative bodies (3)
    • Transparency Lack (1)
    • True Dignity (22)
    • Uncategorized (349)
    • Unused Drug Dangers (1)
    • Unworkability if Regulations Attempt to Make AS "Safe" (1)
    • Updates (1)
    • US (1)
    • Vermont (12)
    • Vermont (5)
    • Vermont Alliance for Ethical Health Care (4)
    • Vermont Governor (4)
    • Vermont Legislature (61)
    • Videos (24)
    • Vote Count on Passage (4)
    • Vote Results (5)

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.